Gagen, McCoy, McMahon, Koss, Markowitz & Fanucci
  • Home
  • About
  • Attorneys
    • Sumita Bhandari
    • Stephen T. Buehl
    • Rachel Margolis Chapman
    • C. Joseph Doherty III
    • Armand M. Estrada
    • Robert M. Fanucci
    • William E. Gagen Jr.
    • Barbara Duval Jewell
    • Charles A. Koss
    • Michael J. Markowitz
    • Aileen Rodriguez Mazanetz
    • Gregory L. McCoy
    • Daniel A. Muller
    • Sarah S. Nix
    • Elizabeth R. Weiss
  • Practice Areas
    • Business And Contract Law
    • Criminal Defense
    • Education Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • Land Use And Real Estate
    • Litigation
    • Tax Law
    • Trusts And Estate Planning
    • Winery And Vineyard Law
  • Developments of Interest
  • Blog
  • Contact
Select Page
NEW CASES OF INTEREST – MAY 13, 2020
  1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Developments of Interest
  4.  » NEW CASES OF INTEREST – MAY 13, 2020

Zehia v. Superior Court (2020) 45 Cal.App.5th 543.

The court finds jurisdiction exists based on substantial contacts which arise under the effects test as result of a nonresident engaging in intentional conduct in sending targeted private social media messages directly to California residents, with the knowledge that they were California residents and intending to cause reputational injury, and therefore personal jurisdiction in the State of California for the nonresident was appropriate.

Matson v. S.B.S. Trust Deed Network (2020) 46 Cal.App.5th 33. An individual purchased a deed of trust through a software application which showed that the deed of trust was in the first position on the property. However, the deed of trust was actually in the second position and had a lower fair market value than the amount that was paid. The buyer sought rescission of the sale and declaratory relief. Summary Judgment was granted in favor of the defendants with the finding that the plaintiffs were not entitled to rescission because they produced no evidence of irregularity, fraud or unfairness in the non-judicial foreclosure notice and sale proceedings. The fact the plaintiffs made a mistake in intentionally submitting a high offer did not justify rescission. Plaintiffs did not act as cautious business people in deciding what to bid without a more thorough investigation of other liens on the property.

Zhang v. Chu  (2020) 46 Cal.App.5th 46. Plaintiff brought a wage and hour action and added the sole shareholder in the company as a defendant on an alter ego basis. After the shareholder was dismissed without prejudice, the shareholder sued the plaintiff’s lawyer for malicious prosecution and the lawyer brought a SLAPP motion. The SLAPP motion was properly granted by the trial court as determined by the court of appeal because the shareholder lacked proof that he would more likely than not succeed in proving that the lawyer had acted with malice. Searching for prospective alter egos in litigation would have been properly related to the merits of a wage and hour case, which is what the lawyer had done, and the shareholder failed to disprove that Plaintiff’s lawyer was properly motivated.

Citizens of Humanity, LLC v. Hass  (2020) 46 Cal.App.5th 589. A manufacturer of designer jeans brought a malicious prosecution action arising after a mislabeling class action was dismissed after a statutory change governing the use of the words “Made in USA” on labels. Defendants brought a SLAPP motion. The motion was denied, the court finding that the manufacturer met its burden of proof for establishing the probability of prevailing on the merits. There were disputed material facts at issue and the issue of malice was supported by evidence that was presented by the manufacturer, thereby justifying dismissal of the SLAPP motion.

Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. ProjectCBD.com  (2020) 465 Cal.App.5th 869. Another SLAPP case in which a manufacturer brought claims for libel, unfair competition and false light arising from the publication of an article questioning the safety of the manufacturer’s product. The manufacturer was not able to demonstrate a probability of prevailing because it failed to identify false statements with specificity regarding its libel claim and the false light and unfair competition claims were derivative of the libel claim and had to be stricken as well.

Related Attorney(s):
Gregory L. McCoy

Practice Areas

  • Business And Contract Law
  • Criminal Defense
    • Drunk Driving Defense
    • Expungement
    • Juvenile Law
    • Sex Crimes
    • Violent Crimes
  • Education Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Land Use And Real Estate
  • Litigation
  • Tax Law
  • Trusts And Estate Planning
    • Advance Health Care Directives
    • Financial Powers Of Attorney
    • Forms Of Property Ownership Between Spouses
      • Joint Tenancy Vs Community Property
      • Separate Property And Community Property
      • The Relationship Between Characterization Of Property, Marital Agreements And Estate Planning
      • Ways To Hold Title For Married Couples In California
    • Probate Procedures And Duties Of A Personal Representative
    • Revocable And Irrevocable Trusts
      • Guide For Transfer Of Assets To A Revocable Living Trust
      • Generation Skipping Transfer Tax Trusts (Dynasty Trusts)
      • Special Needs Trusts
      • The Revocable Living Trust
      • Trust Administration
    • Wills
  • Winery And Vineyard Law

Make An Appointment

To Speak With One Our Attorneys

Contact us today and find out how Gagen, McCoy, McMahon, Koss, Markowitz & Fanucci can assist you.

Call Us Now For Additional Information

To schedule an initial consultation, please call us at 925-837-0585. Our firm boasts decades of experience, and we are prepared to begin working for you.

The Law Offices Of Gagen, McCoy, McMahon, Koss, Markowitz & Fanucci 630 San Ramon Valley Blvd Suite 100 Danville, CA 94526

DANVILLE OFFICE

630 San Ramon Valley Blvd
Suite 100
Danville, CA 94526

Phone: 925-837-0585
Fax: 925-838-5985

Map & Directions
The Law Offices of Gagen, McCoy, McMahon, Koss, Markowitz & Fanucci The Offices at Stonebridge 1030 Main Street, Suite 212 St. Helena, CA 94574

ST. HELENA OFFICE

The Offices at Stonebridge
1030 Main Street, Suite 212
St. Helena, CA 94574

Phone: 707-963-0909
Fax: 707-963-5527

Map & Directions
Review Us
  • Follow
  • Follow

© 2021 Gagen, McCoy, McMahon, Koss, Markowitz & Fanucci. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters